Super Freakonomics Book Summary
Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes And Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance
Book by Steven D. Levitt , Stephen J. Dubner
Feeling Lazy?Read 1 Minute Summary
Summary
In Superfreakonomics, Levitt and Dubner challenge conventional wisdom on topics ranging from prostitution to terrorism to global warming, using data and economic principles to uncover surprising insights and challenge readers to think like a Freak.
Sign in to rate
Average Rating: 5
The Perils Of Walking Drunk
The introduction opens with an interesting statistic - on a per mile basis, walking drunk is 8 times more likely to result in death compared to driving drunk. This counterintuitive finding demonstrates how the authors will challenge conventional wisdom in the rest of the book by looking at data and incentives.
Levitt and Dubner define their approach as looking at the world through the lens of incentives, unintended consequences, and using data to challenge conventional wisdom. They call this blend of economics and rogue curiosity "Freakonomics." The key is to ask interesting questions and follow data, even if it leads to uncomfortable truths.
Section: 1, Chapter: 1
Does Television Cause Crime?
Levitt and Dubner analyze an interesting natural experiment based on when cable TV was introduced to different U.S. cities in the 1940s-1950s. They find that cities that got TV earlier saw a 50% increase in property crime and 25% increase in violent crime compared to late-adopting cities in the following years. The authors suggest TV may have had a causal effect by exposing people to more violent content and reducing social interaction. This surprising finding highlights how even seemingly benign technologies can have major unintended social consequences.
Section: 1, Chapter: 1
Thinking From a Baseline
“In a complex world where people can be atypical in an infinite number of ways, there is great value in discovering the baseline. And knowing what happens on average is a good place to start. By so doing, we insulate ourselves from the tendency to build our thinking - our daily decisions, our laws, our governance - on exceptions and anomalies rather than on reality.”
Section: 1, Chapter: 1
A Day In The Life Of A Chicago Prostitute
The chapter opens by profiling LaSheena, a Chicago prostitute who earns money through an array of both legal and illegal activities - shoplifting, serving as a gang lookout, cutting hair, and turning tricks. The authors interview her to understand the economic realities of her life. Surprisingly, prostitution pays about 4 times more per hour than her other income streams, providing a strong financial incentive despite the many risks and downsides. This vivid personal example draws the reader in while setting up the central economic themes around wage differentials the chapter will explore.
Section: 1, Chapter: 1
How The Feminist Revolution Accidentally Hurt Schoolchildren
As new career opportunities opened up for women outside of teaching in the 1960s-1970s, the most talented female teachers increasingly left education for higher-paying professions like law, medicine, and business. The result was a "brain drain" where the average quality of teachers declined. Levitt and Dubner cite evidence showing that while nearly half of teachers scored in the top 10% on standardized tests in 1960, under 10% did by 1980.
This reduction in teacher quality, the authors argue, likely contributed to the puzzling 1.25 grade-level decline in student test scores from 1967-1980 (equivalent to erasing 3 months of learning per year). While well-intentioned, women's lib seemed to have an unintended consequence of worsening education for the next generation. The chapter highlights how social progress in one area can have surprising ripple effects in other domains.
Section: 1, Chapter: 1
Prostitution Economics 101
Levitt and Dubner lay out a simple economic framework for understanding the business of prostitution:
- Supply and Demand: When demand from male customers outstrips supply of female prostitutes, prices are high. This explains why prostitutes could earn the equivalent of over $76,000/year in early 1900s Chicago.
- Substitute Goods: Competition from other women willing to have unpaid sex acts as a substitute good, eating into prostitutes' earning power. As premarital sex became more common, demand for paid sex fell.
- Pimps as Managers: Pimps provide legitimate business services (protection from police/johns, marketing, price discrimination) in exchange for a 25% cut. Prostitutes working with pimps earn more per trick.
- Price Discrimination: Pimps charge different prices to black vs white customers to maximize revenue. This first-degree price discrimination extracts more total surplus.
Section: 1, Chapter: 1
Why Did Oral Sex Get So Cheap?
One of the starkest findings from the prostitution data is how the price of oral sex has fallen dramatically relative to vaginal sex compared to the early 1900s. While oral sex used to command a significant price premium, it now sells for a 20% discount. The authors propose two main hypotheses for why this might be:
- Oral sex carries lower risks of pregnancy and disease transmission for the prostitute, making it less costly to provide
- Social taboos around oral sex have diminished over time, increasing supply
This example illustrates how shifting technological realities (birth control/STD risk) and cultural norms (sexual taboos) can reshape the relative value of goods and services. Business leaders can apply this same framework of analyzing how macro trends will impact their industry. Anticipating such shifts allows companies to adapt their offerings, pricing, and positioning to stay ahead of the curve.
Section: 1, Chapter: 1
The Dangers Of Daytime Fasting During Pregnancy
Levitt and Dubner examine data on babies born to Muslim mothers who fasted during daylight hours while pregnant during the holy month of Ramadan. Remarkably, they find these babies have a 20% higher likelihood of developing disabilities as adults compared to siblings born in non-Ramadan months.
The effect is most pronounced in summer months in high latitude areas like Michigan, when daylight fasting periods are longest (up to 15 hours). The authors speculate that the extended disruption to the mothers' nutritional intake and circadian rhythms harms fetal development. This powerful example shows how even a short-term shock (1 month out of a 9-month pregnancy) can have lifelong impacts if it occurs during a critical developmental window. More broadly, it highlights the overwhelming importance of prenatal conditions in shaping adult outcomes.
Section: 1, Chapter: 2
Want To Prevent Terrorism? Make Them Buy Life Insurance
Based on an analysis of data on captured terrorists and would-be terrorists, Levitt and Dubner identify some common traits. Compared to the average person, terrorists are more likely to:
- Rent rather than own a home (due to not expecting to live long)
- Not have a life insurance policy (since it doesn't pay out for suicides)
- Make purchases in cash rather than credit/checks (to avoid paper trail)
- Have multiple ATM withdrawals of just under $3000 (to evade mandatory reporting limits)
The authors propose that banks and insurance companies could potentially use these insights to identify individuals at high risk of committing terrorist acts based on their financial and personal records. Of course, such profiling raises major privacy concerns and could ensnare some innocent people exhibiting these same behaviors. But in theory, companies and law enforcement could leverage this data to proactively intervene with would-be terrorists.
Section: 1, Chapter: 2
What Do Doctors And Terrorists Have In Common?
While doctors and terrorists operate in vastly different fields, they share one key trait - their individual actions directly impact the lives and wellbeing of others. Sadly, in both professions, misaligned incentives often lead to poor outcomes:
- ER doctors frequently fail to consistently wash their hands between patients, contributing to hospital-acquired infections that kill 100,000 people per year. Doctors lack strong incentives to take this precaution.
- Terrorists are not deterred by the massive societal damage caused by their attacks because they do not bear those costs directly. In fact, the whole point is to inflict pain on others.
The authors argue that restructuring incentives to ensure people fully internalize the positive and negative impacts of their choices could help improve outcomes in medicine, terrorism, and beyond. For example, hospitals that tie physician compensation to infection reduction metrics see hygiene compliance rise.
Section: 1, Chapter: 2
The Cobra Effect - Why Child Car Seats Don't Work
Child car seats are a well-intentioned innovation, mandated by law in all 50 U.S. states. But a closer look at the data reveals they are shockingly ineffective at their stated goal of reducing child auto fatalities:
- Federal studies find car seats are only about 2% more effective at preventing fatalities than regular seatbelts
- Observational data shows that 80-90%+ of car seats are installed or used incorrectly, rendering them ineffective
- Car seat laws "crowd out" potentially more impactful solutions like driver safety training or stronger DUI enforcement
The authors dub this "the cobra effect" after an apocryphal tale of how a bounty on cobra skins backfired when people started breeding cobras. The lesson is that even the most well-meaning attempts to solve problems through legislation can have perverse unintended consequences. Policymakers must rigorously evaluate actual efficacy using data, not just rely on good intentions. More broadly, this story cautions against top-down mandates and argues for locality in problem-solving.
Section: 1, Chapter: 2
The Kitty Genovese Murder And The Bystander Effect
The chapter opens with the tragic 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese in Queens, NY. While initial reports claimed 38 witnesses saw the attack but failed to intervene or call police, the truth was more complex. Still, the story crystalized the concept of the "bystander effect" where people are less likely to help a victim when others are present.
Levitt and Dubner use the Genovese case to explore the economics of altruism. They argue that contrary to the conventional wisdom that people are innately selfish, experimental games like "Dictator" show people behave generously even when there is no reward. However, the authors caution such altruism has limits and is sensitive to incentives and social pressure. Ultimately, they contend pure altruism is rare and most generous acts are at least partly self-motivated.
Section: 1, Chapter: 3
What Really Happened The Night Kitty Genovese Was Murdered?
While the Kitty Genovese story has become a pop psychology touchstone, Levitt and Dubner argue the actual events were very different than the initial New York Times report suggested:
- There were only a handful of direct witnesses, not 38
- The attack occurred in multiple locations over 30 minutes, not one sustained assault
- At least one witness likely did call the police, though the response was slow
Drawing on recent research and interviews with residents, the authors make the case that apathy and the bystander effect were less at play than imperfect information and the limits of human cognition under stress. They use this to argue that context, incentives, and circumstance shape behavior more than innate altruism or apathy. The Genovese example becomes a metaphor for how the conventional wisdom is often overly simplistic.
Section: 1, Chapter: 3
Altruism And Organ Donation
One domain where society depends heavily on altruism is organ donation. With over 100,000 Americans on the kidney transplant waitlist and 5,000 dying each year, the need for donors is immense. Levitt and Dubner examine different approaches:
- Iran has a free market system where donors are paid ~$1200, clearing the waitlist
- Israel gives transplant priority to registered donors, creating an incentive to opt-in
- The U.S. relies purely on unpaid volunteers but has a severe shortage as a result
The authors argue the U.S. system reveals the limits of pure altruism - even for a life-or-death cause, most won't voluntarily give a kidney to a stranger for free. They propose shifting to a market system could save thousands of lives per year. While acknowledging the valid ethical concerns, Levitt and Dubner argue certain "repugnant" ideas shouldn't be off-limits if they can improve outcomes. They see organ donation as the ultimate test case for altruism's limits.
Section: 1, Chapter: 3
Are People Inherently Altruistic?
“Are people innately altruistic?" is the wrong kind of question to ask. People are people, and they respond to incentives. They can nearly always be manipulated--for good or ill--if only you find the right levers.”
Section: 1, Chapter: 3
The Economist's Guide To Parenting
Levitt, an economist and father of four, applies economic principles to parenting. His key insights:
- Children are expensive, so have them only if the benefits outweigh the costs
- Think on the margin - don't fret over any one decision, focus on cumulative impact
- Incentives matter - use carrots and sticks to encourage good behavior
- Comparative advantage - specialize in what you're best at vs. your spouse
- Economies of scale - the marginal cost and effort of extra children is lower
More controversially, Levitt argues parents often overestimate their own impact relative to chance and genetics. He cites twin and adoption studies suggesting parenting style has limited impact on long-term outcomes. Levitt speculates many parents would be happier and equally effective if they stressed less over parenting choices.
Section: 1, Chapter: 3
Why Are Hospital Infections So Common?
Hospital-acquired infections kill an estimated 100,000 patients per year. One major culprit - doctors failing to wash their hands between patients. This is a classic case of misaligned incentives:
- Doctors don't bear the full cost of skipping a handwash (patient bears risk of infection)
- Handwashing takes time, creating a disincentive for busy doctors to comply
More broadly, the handwashing case study illustrates how smart incentive design can solve stubborn problems. It also shows how data and behavioral economics can be applied to reduce medical errors and improve patient outcomes. Similar principles could extend to other stubborn challenges.
Section: 1, Chapter: 4
Catching Terrorists With Banking Data
the post-9/11 era, a key challenge is identifying potential terrorists before they strike. Traditional methods like informants, surveillance, and data mining have limits. Levitt and Dubner profile a novel approach based on analyzing retail banking data. The concept is that terrorists may exhibit signature financial behaviors like:
- Transferring odd sums to/from high-risk countries
- Making many small withdrawals to avoid reporting rules
- Buying extra life insurance (since policies don't pay out for suicide attacks)
While acknowledging the privacy concerns, they argue the tactic could be a cost-effective, scalable way to prevent attacks and save lives.
Section: 1, Chapter: 4
Unintended Consequences Of Drunk Driving Laws
Conventional wisdom holds that stricter drunk driving laws make roads safer. But Levitt and Dubner argue the data tells a more nuanced story:
- Drunk driving fatalities have fallen sharply since the 1970s, but part of this is due to safer cars/roads, not just tougher laws
- Some studies find lowering the blood alcohol limit from .10 to .08 had no effect on accidents
- Highly publicized crackdowns may simply divert drunk drivers to back roads with less enforcement
- Mandatory license suspensions can inadvertently push offenders to drive illegally
The authors don't dispute that drunk driving is dangerous and should be illegal. But they argue that policymakers often fixate on passing ever-tougher laws rather than rigorously evaluating what actually works to change behavior. They advocate for more emphasis on data, experimentation, and measuring outcomes vs. just inputs. The drunk driving case becomes a metaphor for how good intentions don't always equal good policy.
Section: 1, Chapter: 4
Why Are Some Countries Rich And Others Poor?
One of the biggest questions in economics is why some countries are rich and others poor. Traditional explanations focus on factors like natural resources, education levels, infrastructure, and property rights. But Levitt and Dubner argue another variable is often overlooked: trust.
They argue social trust is the hidden ingredient behind economic growth. In high-trust societies, people can conduct business and solve problems more efficiently vs. wasting time/money constantly verifying commitments. The authors cite survey data showing Scandinavian countries have some of the highest trust levels, while Latin America ranks low.
Levitt and Dubner call for more research into how to quantify and cultivate trust as an economic asset. Overall, it's an example of how "soft" social factors can shape "hard" fiscal realities.
Section: 1, Chapter: 4
Everything You Know About Global Warming Is Wrong
Levitt and Dubner argue that much of the conventional wisdom about global warming is misguided or overly simplistic. They challenge several widely-held beliefs:
- Claim: Hundreds of millions could die from global warming. Reality: Even extreme warming scenarios project far fewer deaths.
- Claim: Carbon dioxide is the key driver of rising temperatures. Reality: Water vapor and other factors play a larger role.
- Claim: Warming will cause devastating sea level rise. Reality: Most models project a manageable 1-2 foot rise by 2100.
- Claim: Warming will cause more extreme weather. Reality: Evidence is mixed, some areas may see fewer hurricanes.
The authors argue many activists overstate the risks and understate the uncertainty in climate projections. They worry hyperbolic doomsaying could lead to panicked decision-making rather than level-headed problem-solving.
Section: 1, Chapter: 5
The Limits Of Carbon Mitigation
Levitt and Dubner are skeptical that carbon mitigation alone can slow global warming. They argue:
- Current technologies like wind/solar are too expensive and limited to replace fossil fuels
- Developing countries like China and India will keep burning coal to fuel growth
- Even aggressive carbon cuts will have modest impact due to CO2's long atmospheric life
The authors compare carbon mitigation to "bringing a garden hose to a fight against a forest fire." They believe more aggressive solutions will be needed alongside emission reductions to meaningfully move the needle. While not discounting the value of conservation, Levitt and Dubner argue it is not a complete solution.
Section: 1, Chapter: 5
What Can Geoengineering Teach Us About Problem-Solving?
Levitt and Dubner profile an audacious proposal by Intellectual Ventures (IV), a research lab founded by former Microsoft executive Nathan Myhrvold:
- Pumping sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere to dim sunlight (mimicking Mt. Pinatubo eruption)
- Deploying a fleet of ships to brighten marine clouds and increase Earth's reflectivity
- Painting roofs/roads white to reflect more heat back to space
IV contends they could be cheaper and faster than carbon mitigation alone. The sulfur concept could offset a century's worth of warming for $250M/year - orders of magnitude less than the cost of typical carbon policies.
Levitt and Dubner argue geoengineering demonstrates how reframing problems can open up new solution spaces. By moving beyond the prevailing paradigm that emission cuts are the only answer, IV is able to contemplate more radical interventions.
Section: 1, Chapter: 5
Global Cooling And The Folly Of Prediction
In the 1970s, some scientists and media outlets warned of a looming ice age. Temperatures had been falling for decades, and some experts extrapolated this trend forward to predict cataclysmic cooling. Levitt and Dubner argue this episode carries lessons for the modern global warming debate:
- Long-term climate predictions are highly uncertain, forecasts can change rapidly as new data emerges
- Media has a tendency to hype the most alarming scenarios, glossing over uncertainty
- Myopic focus on recent data can lead to dangerous extrapolation of temporary trends
The authors note they are not suggesting global warming is another false alarm. The underlying science is far more robust today than in the 1970s. But they argue the global cooling scare demonstrates the need for epistemic humility. Levitt and Dubner believe policymakers should think probabilistically and prepare for multiple futures rather than betting everything on a single forecast.
Section: 1, Chapter: 5
Are Monkeys More Rational Than Humans?
In the epilogue, Levitt and Dubner describe a provocative experiment by Yale economist Keith Chen. Chen taught capuchin monkeys to use money, then observed their economic behavior. Remarkably, the capuchins exhibited many of the same biases and irrationalities as humans:
- The monkeys responded to price changes, buying less of a food when its price rose
- They fell for the "sunk cost fallacy," eating more of a food they paid more for
- Like humans, the monkeys were loss-averse, strongly preferring gambles framed as bonuses vs. deductions
Levitt and Dubner argue the capuchin experiments hold a mirror up to human nature. If even monkeys exhibit economic biases, it suggests they may be more deeply hardwired than we'd like to admit. The authors believe acknowledging the limits of human rationality is a first step to devising policies and incentives that account for it. Rather than expecting people to act like Econs, they suggest we design systems that anticipate predictably irrational actors.
Section: 1, Chapter: 6
Related Content
Freakonomics Book Summary
Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner
Freakonomics is a rogue economist's exploration of the hidden side of everything, from cheating teachers and bizarre baby names to self-dealing realtors and crack-selling mama's boys, teaching you to question the world with data, dig deeper than conventional wisdom, and discern how people get what they want.
Freakonomics is a rogue economist's exploration of the hidden side of everything, from cheating teachers and bizarre baby names to self-dealing realtors and crack-selling mama's boys, teaching you to question the world with data, dig deeper than conventional wisdom, and discern how people get what they want.
Psychology
Sociology
Economics